Talk:Arlen Specter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arlen Specter is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress. You can help by editing this article. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject U.S. Congress articles.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

This article is part of WikiProject Kansas, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Kansas-related articles to a feature-quality standard.

	Arlen Specter is part of WikiProject Pennsylvania, which is building a comprehensive and detailed guide to Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. To participate, you can edit the attached article, join or discuss the project.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

	Arlen Specter is part of the WikiProject Philadelphia, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Philadelphia and the Delaware Valley on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contents 1 Political Role Section 2 NPOV 3 New photo 4 Vicki Siegel Herson controversy 5 who killed kennedy? 6 Concerns About Re-election Passage, Hoefel/Specter Race 7 Texas 8 NARAL

[edit] Political Role Section

I think that this section, or at least the example provided, is misleading. As early as this morning (Meet the Press 2/5/06), Specter still maintains that the NSA spying program is on shaky legal ground, and probably illegal. I believe that statements regarding the president 'acting in good faith' were said in reaction to suggestions to whether or not impeachment proceedings were appropriate. I do not think Specter's mind has been changed on this issue as of yet.

User: DamonJay

I also suggest the line "Arlen Specter is a sniveling little twit" be added to the article somewhere. anon72.76.248.151 16:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

This article sure does not seem to take a NPOV and takes a rather hateful tone.

[edit] New photo

Someone asked for a more recent picture awhile ago...I'm not sure why the comment was deleted. His Senate website doesn't seem to have any recent pictures; does anyone have a newer picture?

Vic Troy

I found a good photo at a PA league of women voters and posted it today. Merecat 22:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Where did it go, then? The present one is terribly outdated. --Dupes 17:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

This is still a problem. The current photo is so old as to be almost unrecognizable. -Will Beback 02:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I concur. The photo in the article looks at least 20 years old. A more recent photo is needed. I would not, however, be opposed to putting the current photo somewhere else in the article.

I was actually about to post a new section about this, but it seems it's already a noted issue. I didn't even recognize him when I saw the picture. This is pretty important. Someone needs to get on this. I'm a pretty new editor, so I'm not entirely familiar with the procedure needed to insert pictures and cite them, but maybe we should stop talking about it and just do it. Nobody appears to have any objections.--Zombiema7 10:30, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vicki Siegel Herson controversy

Her husband is a lobbyist who got over 45 mil in earmarks for his clients. I didn't find any information about this, and don't know enough to post on it.

Sid Simelia

[edit] who killed kennedy?

what about his role during the warren commission?

Third paragraph from the top.

Ruthfulbarbarity 21:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Concerns About Re-election Passage, Hoefel/Specter Race

I could be mistaken, but I don't recall many observers asserting that Specter had moved too far to the right in order to win his last campaign for that seat.

Aside from making some concessions to the Bush administration with respect to facilitating the confirmation of prospective federal judges I don't think he embraced mainstream conservative Republicanism at all.

In fact, he condoned the decision by some union locals to produce Specter-Kerry lawn signs.

If anything, most people were of the view that conservatives staying home-or voting, but withholding their votes from Specter-would pose more of a challenge to his re-election.

Plus, the way his victory is described is a bit misleading.

Yes, in comparison to most Senate races-where the incumbent faces no real opposition-Specter's victory was "narrow," but in comparison to other races he has contested-for example, his razor-thin victory over his female opponent in 1992-his margin of victory was rather large.

Ruthfulbarbarity 21:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Texas

Putting WikiProject Texas here so the bot will not retag it. Ingrid 14:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Out of morbid curiosity, why is it that the bot feels that this page should be tagged as WikiProject Texas? Sixtus LXVI 18:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NARAL

The following parenthetical statement should be removed:

• • (although he recieved a 20% rating from NARAL, indicating a pro-life record)

as NARAL's criteria are extremely partisan and do not accurately express stance on abortion in an NPOV manner. His 20% rating comes from a budget issue he voted against and some judicial nominees he supported. Not making abortion a hot-button automatic rubber-stamp issue is very different from being Pro-Life.