Talk:Behringer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Professional sound production WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the technology, equipment, companies and professions related to professional sound production. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
copyright controversey needs to be revised. It reads like someone's opinion piece and not like an encyclopedia. CHM 01:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
I slightly agree, although, point of view is varied. Anyhow, the page is now incircled by the Entertainment Technology WikiProject, so "Help is on the way" if you will. -- Wforlines 03:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
I have a feeling that someone inside the company company is editing this page. I already cleaned this page for neutrality once, and parts have been rewritten to a biased point of view. - October 7th 2006
- I don't think so. The criticism section is quite "against" behringer.--Leonardo Horovitz 02:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Terrible spelling in the 'controversy' section, lacking in sources etc. - Xiang 8 Oct 2006
Needs some sources -- Gronkmeister | Talk/Contrib 15:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
However bias the Copyright Controversy section might be, it's no-where near as one-sided as the "Products" section. It's a statement of fact that the brand is often regarded poorly, and has been challenged about designs - but to speculate on the supposed performance and value of equipment is well beyond the scope of an unbias article.
[edit] Reads like a marketing piece
Statements like "offer a quality that competes and is comparable with competitors products" are clearly offering a point of view, especially in light of the fact that Behringer gear is widely derided by professional musicians and recording studio personell. 210.239.48.141 04:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
