Talk:Bride
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Because there are no references anywhere to "Bride" as a reference to Brigid, I am taking this off the list of disambiguation pages. The second meaning is adequately captured as a footnote.
[edit] Bride drawing
Look, I'm new here and I don't want to stir up anything, but I'm questioning the inclusion of that chibi illustration of a bride on this page. It's cute, I agree. It's very nicely drawn. It's also the third picture on an article that is three (short) paragraphs long. It's making the page display funny for me and I'm running 1024x768. Also, it's not GFDL on a page that already has two very nice GFDL images.
I also don't feel that it's appropriate for an encyclopedia. Yes, Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, but it's still an encyclopedia, and I don't expect to crack open the Encyclopedia Britannica and see chibi drawings. Engravings and illustrations, yes, but not a cartoonlike representation such as this illustration.
I've gone ahead and commented it out. Please feel free to chide me if you feel I have removed it inappropriately. (janeway216 02:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC))
- Chide you? When I could instead strew (?) rose-petals in your path for a few minutes, at least? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Too many pictures, not enough content?
There seems to be way too many pictures on this article, and not enough content. The reference to Brigid is taken out, as well. Im sure you only need 1 or two pictures. Disinclination 07:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
