Talk:Burbank, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects Click on [show] for further details
This article is part of WikiProject Southern California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Southern California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
This article is supported by WikiProject Cities, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Cities on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

"Warner Bros." is the official name of the company, not "Warner Brothers"

You're right, I'll rename the page. --Brion

---

See also some naming discussion at Talk:Burbank, Los Angeles, California.

This should merge, or be redirected (or vice-versa) with Burbank, Los Angeles County, California. tcotrel 12-27-03

---

I would argue that Burbank is north, if not slightly northwest of downtown Los Angeles, as opposed to Northeast as stated in the article.--Srini91 09:35, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Airport

I clarified the statement about Burbank Airport being the second largest airport in Los Angeles county. It was too vague.

A person may interpret this in area, or total volume, instead of commercial traffic volume.

Palmdale Regional Airport is the largest airport in Los Angeles county in area, followed by LAX.

Van Nuys Airport is the busiest airport in Los Angeles County total volume wise (daily take-offs and landings), as well as in the world. LAX is second in total volume in the county.

LAX is the largest in commercial traffic volume in the County, and third in the U.S.A. Then Bob Hope Airport, as it's now called, comes in second in the county.

This will give Wikipedia users a more accurate analysis of the statement.

--Anon 07:07, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)