Talk:Eben Moglen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

Is the link to audio/video in proprietary format a good idea ? What is the exact policy regarding external links and link to proprietary format ?

No, it is definately not a good idea. These links should point to Ogg Vorbis and Ogg Theora or some other format one can play with free software (Speex, FLAC, Dirac, etc.).

You are allowed to link to proprietary formats and to non-proprietary formats. The latter are preferable, but there is no ban on the former --Gronky

Contents 1 Megabytes and Mibibytes 2 Russian article 3 Stance? 4 please improve this article! 5 Anarchist? 6 Born date? 7 Unencyclopedic 8 Lawyer?

[edit] Megabytes and Mibibytes

For the sake of making this page a useful source of info for the general public, can we please follow the standard set by every other wikipedia page and use Megabytes instead of Mibibytes? --Gronky

Heh. Which megabyte would that be? One actual megabyte, that is, 1,000,000 bytes? Or 1,024,000 bytes (which Firefox apparently uses in its download manager)? Or 1,048,576 bytes, which Windows Explorer uses? Both Firefox and Windows Explorer calls what they show "MB", by the way. I chose the last one, which can unambigously be labeled with "Mib". Those who don't know the difference won't care. Note that many of the file sizes were specified in various other kinds of "megabytes"; I have merely unified them and labeled them with an exact label. 194.47.144.5 21:55, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Which megabyte? It doesn't matter. The difference between two definitions you give is minimal. Only nerds like us know what a Mibibyte is. Wikipedia is for the general public, those who couldn't give you any definition for megabyte if you asked them, but they know a 65 megabyle file is real slow on their phone line connection, etc. This might be your soapbox, mine is GNU/Linux instead of Linux, but lets not be a pain in the ass to the wikipedia readers by trying to use wikipedia as a loudspeaker. --Gronky

Firstly, it's called a mebibyte, not mibibyte. But that doesn't matter, because I never use the full word. I use "Mib", which is close enough to "Mb" for people to reasonably guess that it's the same sort of thing. And if they don't, they'll find out when they download the file anyway. 194.47.144.5 19:49, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I have now changed all occurences of "Mib" to "MiB" to conform to the usage in the Mebibyte and Megabyte articles. /Same user as above, 00:38, 21 Jul 2005 (UTC)

---

[edit] Russian article

Hey, I am new here. I just added a Russian article on the subj and I am wondering what hoops I have to jump through if I want it cross-linked with all other languages. Thanks much! melikamp 06:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

If you mean having the Russian version linked with all versions in other languages: Some people here run bots that automatically update interwiki links. They will automatically pick up the change you made and propagate it to other language versions. That can take a while, though. Rl 06:55, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stance?

Removed this from the article since it's redundant and could be interpreted as slightly POV:

Moglen believes the GNU General Public License is not a contract.

This is silly; of course he does. It says so right in the GPL itself, it is also the FSF's official stance, and Eben is their General Counsel. Also, to call it a "belief" seems to be trying to characterize it as a controversial or unexpected position; i.e. POV. --83.226.8.35 08:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] please improve this article!

This person will be a remote presenter at Wikimania, and as such we can expect this article to get more traffic than usual. Now would be a great time improve if possible, and make sure everything is accurate! Brassratgirl 20:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anarchist?

User:200.69.167.103 just added [Category:American Anarchists]. I would like to see some reference to where he calls himself an anarchist; otherwise I will revert this. --193.11.177.69 03:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Apparently, in Free as in Freedom, Eben makes a reference to his anarchism. It's cited here in the first paragraph:

In a restaurant in New York two men were sitting together having lunch and they considered the next steps of their little revolution. One of them, Eben Moglen, briefly thought about how they must have looked like to the people passing by. `Here we were, these two little bearded anarchists, plotting and planning the next steps. Anybody who overheard our conversation would have thought we were crazy, but I knew: I knew the revolution was right here at this table.’ And the man sitting next to him, Richard Stallman, was the person who was supposed to make it happen. (Cp. Williams 2002, 184)

Moglen also wrote an article called Anarchism Triumphant and has been publicly associated with anarchism many times. Of course, the above statement could also be hyperbole or tounge-in-cheek. Personally, I'm completely neutral on whether to keep the category. Perhaps someone should just ask him. -- mako 15:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Another argument for calling him an anarchist is that he talks about free software in terms of allowing "anarchist" systems, which he says work better [1]. And another argument for saying he's not an anarchist is that in this interview [2] he says that some people might call him an anarchist based on inconclusive evidence (he doesn't say he is not an anarchist, he just ridicules the evidence used by some to say that he is). Go figure. Gronky 22:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

I have read FAIF, and interpret that passage it as an obvious allusion to the old clichéd idea of bearded subversive anarchist revolutionaries. I also note that he also wrote something called “The dotCommunist Manifesto”, and recently said “I’m enough of a Marxist that I actually do think that it matters what capitalists do”. So, I don’t think either of those things could be used to definitively categorize him as either an anarchist or a Marxist. I don’t think it would help to ask him, since if he wanted to risk labelling himself as something that specific, you would think he would have done so by now. I’m removing the category. -- 193.11.177.69 00:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Born date?

When was Moglen born? This is completely missing from the article. --Haakon 17:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unencyclopedic

Basically this only covers the activities with and the pro-FSF stance. Surely there must be more to this person than one prejudiced viewpoint?211.10.18.77 10:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree that this is not a very well-rounded article, but that's just the way development works. Some aspects of some topics take longer to finish than others. Help if you can. Gronky 11:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lawyer?

Lquilter just (02:47, 29 October 2006) added "Category:Lawyers". But some time ago, on 23:28, 3 June 2005, Gronky removed the category "American Lawyers", saying "he's not one". Who is and isn’t a lawyer, anyway? Moglen recently seemed to confirm being an "attorney":

[Leo Laporte:]

So, are you, you’re an attorney, Eben?

[Eben Moglen:]

Yes, that’s correct, I went to law school and got a history Ph.D. after a career as a computer programming language designer.

So is he or isn’t he a lawyer? --193.11.177.69 06:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't check for that history. He's a law professor at Columbia; he was admitted to the NY bar in 1988 with bar registration # 2218014. (See NY State Bar Assn search at http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/attorney/AttorneyDetails?attorneyId=5452766 .) So he is an attorney. The article itself says he's general counsel for the Free Software Foundation, so as general counsel he's a lawyer. -- LQ 13:17, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I see, thank you. Please write this information into the article, even if just as a reference. Interestingly, that page you referenced says “Next Registration: Jul 2006”; does this mean he’s missed renewing something and isn’t a lawyer anymore? Also, wouldn’t “Category:American lawyers” be better than “Category:Lawyers”? --193.11.177.69 08:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I added the bar search as a reference; the other material is basically already included. ... Registration "July 2006" means that he was due to re-register July 2006. He might be a little late, or they might not have updated their database. You wouldn't be disbarred right away for being a little late on your bar dues. Individual bars might eventually do disciplinary proceedings for bar dues, but one would have to check with the state bar association. Not sure. --LQ 16:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)