Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Doctor Who
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Doctor Who
Not exactly a self-nomination, though I've been one of a regular group of people who have done extensive work on the Doctor Who set of pages over the last half year or so. -khaosworks 02:57, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Are anons allowed to nominate? If so, then I'm putting this marvellously comprehensive article forward. --195.11.216.59 17:44, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Well I've suggested that Khaosworks pushes for this to be a FAC, and I think it should be too. Support. violet/riga (t) 17:57, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: could perhaps do with some more references - there must be more available violet/riga (t) 23:11, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Reply: I could put in more references, but none that directly contributed to the information above. The bulk of the references are in the sub-page History of Doctor Who. -khaosworks 03:17, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: could perhaps do with some more references - there must be more available violet/riga (t) 23:11, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Maybe some of the fansites in the external links section need to be cleaned out, but the article seems otherwise well-researched, comprehensive and understandable, even to a non-fan like me. Support. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 21:56, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Excellent work, gives a great overview of the program without ever sinking to the level of fan trivia. Support for sure. Shane King 03:00, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)
- Minor object. The "Viewership" section needs a copyedit, and the removal of some convoluted/injokey material. It'd be nice to see it get a good copyedit all over - it's not quite brilliant prose, although it is nearly there. Ambi 08:22, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I've attempted a once over copyedit. If you could point to something specific that should be changed, that'd be great. -khaosworks 12:46, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- It's fine work, I'm happy to support. Everyking 10:10, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -- ALoan (Talk) 13:08, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Nice article. Support. -- Arwel 14:47, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support - Chrism 12:38, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Wonderfully thorough. —αγδεε(τ) 09:00, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC)
- Support --ZayZayEM 04:17, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
