User:Fernando Moreno
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Wikipedia:Babel | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||
Search user languages |
I’m 42 years old and live in Seville, Spain. My English is still quite bad, but I want to try it. I have studied Philosophy and my interests are in mathematics, that is to say: Philosophy of science in general and of mathematics in particular.
I like everything about mathematics, but specially Analysis and the investigation of new possibilities in this one (Non-standard analysis, ...). I have in project a work in this topic that I never finish and I’m hoping someday to publish, then it's difficult to take time out from your familiar life and your profession.
The only thing which I have published until now is a work in Number Theory about Fermat's Last Theorem (http://www.solucionfermat.es). It happened that a day I discovered this theorem and I hooked up to it ;-) , like so many others before I and after I.
I’m new in Wikipedia and its philosophy to publish free and open likes me a lot. So I’m to your disposition in the section of discussion. I little by little hope to discover all possibilities that allow the tools exist here.
In reference to my beliefs, I think they can be summarized in the following meditation about if material existence of things has or not a metaphysical condition and I leave it here in order to you can reach your own conclusions:
Nothing exists in itself. A thing exists seen from another and that other, if there is nothing more, seen from the first one. What exists is the relation between both things. But at the same time such a relation depends on the existence of a distance between both and that distance of the existence of something which metaphysically separates them. This entity that separates the things and puts them in relation is the unique one can be said ontologically exists and that it is outside them making possible their existence and because theirs, its own. And it is which I would name God.
P.S. I have not dare to formalize it logically, but if somebody dares to do this, concept by concept, he would must obtain a homomorphism of the following:
Into: von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory (NBG)
For:
--Fernando Moreno 10:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)