Talk:Franklin Avenue Shuttle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| See also: WikiProject Trains to do list | |||
 |
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is maintained by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation.
|
This article needs a spell check and a little more information. --imdanumber1 20:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- What kind of information do you have in mind? This article is about the shuttle service. There is also an article about the line itself. -- Cecropia 15:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- If you check the other shuttle's subway line info table, that is what I had in mind. --imdanumber1 21:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. -- tariqabjotu 03:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
S – Franklin Avenue Shuttle (New York City Subway service) → Franklin Avenue Shuttle — I am also proposing to move S – 42nd Street Shuttle (New York City Subway service) to 42nd Street Shuttle. These are the only things that have these names. The unwieldly diambiguation is not needed; a much simpler name can be used. --NE2 16:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC) NE2 16:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
[edit] Survey - in support of the move
- Support. Unnecessary disambiguation is clutter. It's easy to figure out it's a NYC Subway service from the lede. That's too much information for the title if it's not necessary to disambiguate. – flamurai (t) 20:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support Don't disambiguate unless necessary. --Polaron | Talk 23:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Changed to support. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support per above. Tinlinkin 12:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey - in opposition to the move
# Oppose. I really don't see the point in moving the article. The current title is just fine. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Why is that a reason to oppose? Or are there reasons you don't think the new name would be "just fine"? --NE2 17:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Changed to Support, as Flamurai's suggestion makes a good decision for move. --Imdanumber1 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
