Talk:Future Combat Systems Mounted Combat System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (general topics):
	Military technology and engineering task force
	Weaponry task force
Related task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

I've create a sub-temp, using text directly copied from http://www.army.mil/fcs/factfiles/mcs.html, which is not protected by copyright.

[edit] Neutrality

Can somebody say why the neutrality of this article is disputed? --AlainV 02:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Not sure about the neutrality, but I added a controversy section so I'd say it's pretty balanced at the moment, maybe we should go ahead and remove the neurtrality thing? --202.7.166.168 06:54, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 14.5mm protection

There's an error with the 14.5mm protection part, I'm pretty sure USSR 14.5 Ammo is almost twice as powerful as NATO 12.7mm. Spoonman.au 03:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that's true. 14.5 is a large heavy machine gun round. I removed the comparison. Deleuze 01:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Main gun

What will the size of the main gun on this vehicle be? Also, can it be airdropped? Redxiv 05:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Main gun is 105 mm, but I understand there's some talk about going to 120 mm. The vehicle as designed is over 30 tons now; not sure if that's too much for airdropping. -Amatulic 20:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../f/u/t/Talk%7EFuture_Combat_Systems_Mounted_Combat_System_2e6b.html"

Categories: Stub-Class military technology and engineering articles | Military technology and engineering task force articles | Stub-Class weaponry articles | Weaponry task force articles | Stub-Class United States military history articles | United States military history task force articles | Stub-Class military history articles