Talk:Hazel Miner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of North Dakota. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||||
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||||
|
More information about this article...
|
|||||
 |
Hazel Miner has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. |
[edit] GA Review
This article has been reviewed against the good article criteria and has been put on a seven day hold. This means that it is generally good but has some minor problems which should be easy and quick to fix.
Well Written: PASS but the problem in this section must be rectified if this article is to pass GA.
- They took the three children to the home of William Starck, a neighbor, and cared for them "tenderly." Punctuation should be outside the quotation marks
Factually Accurate and Verifiable: FAIL
- She said, "Oh, my! I am wet clear to the waist and my shoes are full of water," her brother recalled later.
- Reference please
- At about one o'clock he hitched their horse, "Old Maude," up to their light sleigh and told Hazel to wait while he went back to the school's barn to get his horse. Hazel wasn't strong enough to keep the horse from heading out into the blizzard before her father came back from the barn.
- Reference those please
- They took the three children to the home of William Starck, a neighbor, and cared for them "tenderly."
- Reference any quotations
- The first paragraph of the Legacy section needs references
Broad: PASS
NPOV: PASS
Stable: PASS
Pictures: PASS
- Although a picture of the stone which is not copywrited at all would be preferable - unrestricted use is adequate though.
Chrisfow 17:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I think I've fixed the things you mentioned. Anything else? --Bookworm857158367 18:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- No, that should do nicely! GAs on hold should stay like that for a minimum of 2 days, but since Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy I have passed this article now. Good job, Bookworm! Chrisfow 18:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Thanks. It's fun to see my "pet project" reach GA status. I've put a lot of effort into it this week. --Bookworm857158367 18:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
