Hernandez v. Texas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hernandez v. Texas | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |||||||||||||
Argued January 11, 1954 Decided May 3, 1954 |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Holding | |||||||||||||
The Court decided that Mexican Americans and all other racial groups in the United States had equal protection under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. | |||||||||||||
Court membership | |||||||||||||
Chief Justice: Earl Warren Associate Justices: Hugo Black, Stanley Forman Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Robert H. Jackson, Harold Hitz Burton, Tom C. Clark, Sherman Minton |
|||||||||||||
Case opinions | |||||||||||||
Majority by: Warren Joined by: unanimous |
|||||||||||||
Laws applied | |||||||||||||
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (1954)[1], was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that decided that Mexican Americans and all other racial groups in the United States had equal protection under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Contents |
[edit] Background
Pete Hernandez, a Mexican agricultural worker, was convicted for the murder of Joe Espinoza. Hernandez believed that the jury could not be impartial unless members of other races were allowed on the jury-selecting committees, seeing that a Mexican American had not been on a jury for more than 25 years in his particular county in the U.S. state of Texas. Hernandez and his lawyers took the case to the Supreme Court. The legal team included Gustavo C. Garcia, Carlos Cadena, James deAnda, Chris Alderete, and John J. Herrera.
[edit] Ruling
Chief Justice Earl Warren and the rest of the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Hernandez. The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment protects those beyond the racial classes of white or Negro, and extends to other racial groups, such as Mexican American in this case.
[edit] Social implications
The ruling was yet another step forward in the American Civil Rights Movement and another hit to racial segregation in the USA. This time, racial minorities other than African Americans benefited from such a ruling. The ultimate impact of this ruling, however, was that now all racial groups of the United States were protected under the 14th Amendment.
Sadly, the oral arguments of this case have been lost. However, the United States Supreme Court docket sheet and letter from Justice Clark to Chief Justice regarding joining opinion are available online.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- University of Texas School of Law archive on Hernandez case
- Hernández v. the State of Texas from the Handbook of Texas Online
[edit] Court documents
Terms
Chicano · La Raza · Latino · Mexican-American · Hispanic
Pre-Chicano Movement
Mexican-American history · Mexican-American War · Sleepy Lagoon trial · Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo · Zoot Suit Riots
Chicano Movement
Aztlán · Católicos por La Raza · Chicanismo · Chicano Blowouts · Chicano Moratorium · Plan Espiritual de Aztlán · Plan de Santa Barbara · Farm workers rights campaign · Land grant struggle · Colegio César Chávez
Supreme Court cases
Hernandez v. Texas · Plyler v. Doe · Mendez v. Westminster
Culture
Chicano Park · Chicano rap · Chicano rock · Cholo · Estrada Courts murals · Lowrider · Pachuco · Teatro Campesino · Tortilla art · Zoot suit
Lists and categories
List of Caló words and expressions · List of Chicano poets · U.S. communities with a Hispanic majority · List of notable Chicanos · Notable Hispanics
Category:Mexican Americans · Category:Mexican-American organizations