Talk:Ilona Feher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
 |
Ilona Feher is part of the WikiProject Israel, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Israel articles. |
|
Project Israel To Do (Drop-Down Menu):
|
|
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Merge Ilona Feher & Ilona Feher Foundation
"Ilona Feher" and the "Ilona Feher Foundation" are different, distinct entities.
Wikified. I do not understand the reason and do not know what action to take. Please advise. Thanks. (by USer:Micke5000, 23:58, 20 July 2005)
- Sorry for not clarifying my intention when I've tagged the articles. Here goes...
- Since Ilona Feher (the person) and Ilona Feher (the Foundation) are different things, the articles should reflect that. So the information about "the person" should be kept to a minimum in the article about "the Foundation", whatever is neede to estableish why it was named after her. If a reader wants more detailed info on "the person" (s)he will follow the link.
- After doing a second and more carefull reading I must admit I may have been to hasty with the tagging. So I'll remove it, even if I still ask you to consider my suggestion of keeping the subjets well separated.
- You did exactly what you should. You went to the talk page and disputed the merge suggestion.
- Welcome! - Nabla 01:07, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
Thanks again for the guidance. What you have written makes perfect sense. For the "foundation" I just copied the founders' text "as is" whithout editing. For the Wikipedia it may need rewriting. I'll review it and try to make it more focused where possible. Micke5000 05:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
