Talk:Insex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on September 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
[edit] Removed commercial sites
Just a quick note, per previous discussions on AfD page, the commercial web sites listed aren't an important part of the information. I edited these out, and was able to keep the full meaning of the article. I hope that doesn't get anyone bent out of shape. If so, my apologies. Please see Wikipedia:External links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. Atom 08:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
The AfD discussed many things, but the outcome was to keep this site. It would be great to maintain a link to the old Insex web page, except that page links to commercial sites that replace it. Someone interested can just go type "insex" in google. What is important is that Wikipedia:External Links does not allow it here. Using this page to push business to the replacement web sites isn't appropriate here.
If there is content on the original insex page that is relevant to the article, it should be brought into the article. Atom 19:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- Pretty much every article among Category:Erotica websites links to at least one - often several - commerical websites. Banning any link to a commerical website is not WP policy. Sloan21 21:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, using Wikipedia to drive business to web sites is not appropriate. The article is about Insex, not for sending business to the companies who bought it. See Wikipedia:External Links. Just because it occurs against policy in other articles doesn't make it okay.
