User talk:Interested2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
sorry, im new at this, thanks for the advice --!paradigm! 18:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)!paradigm!
Contents |
[edit] Removal of link
please explain how the fearsome critters link is not relavant avter visiting this website http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fearsome_Creatures_of_the_Lumberwoods,_With_a_Few_Desert_and_Mountain_Beasts this refers to the same "fearsome critters" as i do and yet splintercat is relivant here?
thanks, --!paradigm! 19:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)!paradigm!
- Your wiki entry on Fearsome Critters is...inappropriately informal (this goes mostly for it's title) - if you wished to link to the book, please, link to the book. Alternatively, please see the entry on cryptids - that replicates virtually all of the information on your Fearsome Critters. Interested2 20:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to the mire
Anti-vaccinationist page. Midgley 09:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ayep. -Interested2 13:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil Atheist Conspiracy
Hello. In your vote to keep the EAC article, you mention two articles about it that you think establish its relevance (which I take to be notability). Another editor and I have asked what these articles are, because without them, we cannot justify keeping the article, according to WP:WEB. Please tell us about these articles, or direct us to them, if they are on the web. Rohirok 02:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- My bad. I'll update those with the links right now. I assume you're talking about alt.atheism and another one....which I can't seem to find anymore. Saw it yesterday while browsing too. I'll edit my comment to reflect that.
[edit] Loserz
Hi,
I didn't speedy delete this; I closed its AfD debate as a delete after the normal five days, and deleted pursuant to that AfD. The CSD do not apply in cases where an article is taken to AfD. This article reached AfD a second time after Wikipedia:Deletion Review overturned a previous no consensus closure in an older AfD. Best wishes, Xoloz 14:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- My bad then, didn't catch the link to the second debate. Sorry for the misunderstanding. -Interested2 16:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
