User talk:Jeremybub
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome! The problem with the Ultimate starting in Amherst connection is that it isn't sourced, and a t-shirt is hardley an authoritative source. There are multiple sources for the NJ origin. I'd recommend we discuss this on the Talk:Ultimate_frisbee. I'm also not really happy with the "first and largest children's league" because it's unsourced, but I don't have information that contradicts it, so what the hay. :) Also, it makes it a bit easier to follow if you sign your posts...this is done by using ~~~~ (4 tildes). I'll start a section on the talk page. Again, welcome. :) Wikibofh 22:14, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
Hi. Please don't replace articles that have been removed per policy. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 22:45, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
No problem. Sorry if "losing" an article confused you a bit. :) - Lucky 6.9 22:53, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Yeah, it was a bit short, the title was a bit unconventional and it probably couldn't have been expanded much beyond what was there. Not to worry. Chalk it up as a learning experience. In fact, you might want to read some of the tutorial articles to give you a better idea as to how to contribute. You can always leave word on my talk page as well. Glad to help. - Lucky 6.9 22:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Good job on that new school stub. Just needs a bit of cleaning up. Some advice, though: A lot of articles about small schools wind up being nominated for removal. Not your fault, of course. You didn't know. Can you add any more info to it? I'll try and help. - Lucky 6.9 23:11, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
This is coming together nicely! Are you having fun? - Lucky 6.9 23:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Sure is. Nice work. The external links are a huge help and the fact that ARMS is a pilot school for that program makes it extremely noteworthy. I have to run, but feel free to keep working on it. Also, you might want to contact User:Kappa. He is very interested in school articles and does a lot of expansion on them. Later! Great work! - Lucky 6.9 23:31, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] chartwells
why did you kill it, there is a lot of information out there about it
- It wasn't an article, it was just half a sentence. If you want to write an article on a subject that's highly commendable, but spend a little time working out what there is to be said about the subject and how best to say it. Even a stub really be at least a few complete, grammatically correct sentences. --fvw* 00:13, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Amanda Reed
It's not a candidate for speedy deletion. If you believe it should be deleted, list it on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. -- Francs2000 
20:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Four types of evidence
You're right, I was being lazy. I should have instead tagged it as a copyvio. I thought that a redirect would be alright, but apparantly that it is only in the case of a revert, or at least that is the strict reading of Wp:copyvio. I'll list it on the copyvio page. Jkelly 03:01, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- Even if it were the case that the anonymous IP article creator was indeed the author of the Findlaw.com text which was pasted into Wikipedia, Findlaw.com retains the right to publish and the right to re-publish its material. If you're interested in "categories of evidence", let me encourage you to chip in on the Evidence (law) article. Oh, and just as a heads-up, I'm going to revert the mention of "Four types of evidence" that you added to the Evidence disambig page. You added it to the line involving the philosophical study of reality and the scientific method. The Findlaw.com divisions are discussing evidence in a legal sense. Jkelly 23:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Two High Schools?
I think I answered your question on amherst high school Amherst Regional High School --Vcelloho 03:04, Nov 9, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] RuneScape cheat sites
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. CaptainVindaloo t c e 01:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- (Crossposted here and at my user talk page) Sorry, but cheat sites are *not* appropriate here. They do nothing to improve the article, they are a potential threat to RuneScape players (drive-by keylogger attacks), and they give Jagex sufficient reason to order us to remove the RuneScape screenshots in the articles. Cheating also ruins the game for legitimate players. CaptainVindaloo t c e 02:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- playing also ruins the LIFE of legitamate players...Jeremybub 05:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] January 2007
With regards to your comments on User:68.201.101.192: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. →AzaToth 00:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- You shouldn't give people fake warning messages. →AzaToth 20:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- thats why i dont... i setriously will get mad if you keep on amking stuff up. Jeremybub 20:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Do not repeatedly add warnings to other user's pages. They have a right to remove comments if they wish. --InShaneee 21:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- It was removed because it was inappropriate, as is your confrontational attitude towards other users. --InShaneee 21:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- speaking of a confrontational atitude... what about aztek... he gave me a bogus warning. im sorry you think that a modifyed warning message is too graphic for the youngsters... i will try not to post any more innapropriate material.
Jeremybub 20:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
