Talk:John Snobelen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GoldDragon edits
Do other readers believe that GoldDragon's edits should be retained? CJCurrie 04:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think they should, they're editorializing. Ardenn 04:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CJCurrie attack article
It just so happens that CJCurrie is the original author of this article and most of the original claims appear to be from a teachers' union rep. Some of the recent additions and subtle modifications don't cover up the fact that the article still fundamentally reeks of POV. GoldDragon 14:41, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Feel free to suggest examples of POV. CJCurrie 02:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
GD: this is not a useful comment. If you believe that there is POV, state what it is here. It should be obvious to others if it is POV. Criticizing CJC's edits without stating what specifically is wrong with them does not help resolve the debate in any way. Please make better use of talk pages. They really do help resolve things and improve Wikipedia. Ground Zero | t 02:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Comment
GD,
I believe you're in violation of the 3RR. Your current edit is actually an improvement in some respects, though there are other points I'd take issue with. One way or the other, you may want to revert yourself for the time being. CJCurrie 01:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)