Talk:John Stuart, 3rd Earl of Bute
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
While comprehensive, this seems unduly biased against Bute. Calling John Wilkes a "journalist" is a bit of an overstatement, as the North Briton was little more than an organ for anti-Scottish sentiment. One issue actually landed him in jail for slander.
Was Bute even in the Lords during his Premiership? I always thought he was a Scottish peer and at this stage was not a representative. Timrollpickering 00:43, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
(Copied from Talk:Leader of the House of Lords)
Was Bute even in the Lords during my premiership? I recalling that he wasn't, being a Scottish peer (though had been a representative peer in an earlier parliament). Timrollpickering 12:11, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
He held the title of Baron Mount Stuart in the Peerage of Great Britain from 1761, I believe. john k 18:05, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- According to his entry in the Dictionary of National Biography it was his wife who had that title, but Bute was elected a representative peer in 1761 (and had previously been one from 1737 until 1741). This was, however, a month after he was appointed Secretary of State for the Northern Department. Timrollpickering 20:48, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
The statement that George III began to see through Bute after Bute became premier seems unfair as the article gives no indication what there was to see through. Dudley Miles 21 January 2007
[edit] Relation to present Marquis of Bute
Should we cross reference to Marquis of Bute and explain difference?
Categories: Politics and government work group articles | Unassessed biography (politics and government) articles | Unknown-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Peerage work group articles | Unassessed biography (peerage) articles | Unknown-priority biography (peerage) articles | Unassessed biography articles