User talk:Josephs1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Lupin's anti-vandal tool
See User:Ihope127's reply to you at User talk:YOURNAME/monobook.js. Jobarts-Talk 08:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] it wasn't vandalism
the changes you made to the james blunt article simply reversed my changes to what i had written anyway. I changed the structure of a comment made by someone else which had been deleted for no apparent reason. I don't mind that you changed it (because you changed it to what i had adapted anyway) but don't say it was due to vandalism. thanks.
- Sorry, I don't know what I thought there : ). I'll be more careful and thanks for reminding me here.josephs1 16:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism? Not so much.
I'm curious as to why you deemed my addition to Wikipedia's entry "Adagio for Stings" to be vandalism. I added a pertinent reference that the piece of music in question had been said to be a perfect expression of the depth of the 1994 Rwandan genocide. This from the Canadian general who was running the UN peacekeeping force, and documented in his book "Shake Hands with the Devil." Deem it irrevelent perhaps, but not vandalism.
- Blah...I didn't mean to say that. I was fixing so much vandalism at the time that I guess I accidently put that in by accident. Sorry! I think I meant to say unnescessary but that never came through...I think I'll take that edit back and thanks for bringing this to my attention. I see your reasoning behing putting that in. Again, I'm very sorry. If you look at the comment above this, see that I was doing this in the same day and I guess I was having a bad time. Very sorry. I'll be sure to vertify my edits to check for a stupid mistake like this...Thanks again : )
