User talk:Kuronue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kuronue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
Runcorn 21:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 European witchcraft 2 Greets 3 Sat/tan 4 A Modest Destiny

[edit] European witchcraft

WOW! It looks like you did a major overhaul of that page. You may not have noticed, but my comment on that page was from over two years ago. When I originally created the European witchcraft page, it was just a copy of the main Witchcraft article, which was horribly thrown together itself. I started to make revisions offsite, but unfortunately got wrapped up in real life and abandoned the project. Hopefully I'll get the time to read through this latest version of the article and make some additions. I have numerous, well-referenced, non-fluffy books on the history of witchcraft, so I should be able to make a contribution now, even if I dropped the ball on it two years ago.

[edit] Greets

Nice "meeting" you. Your suggestion to people who have issues with your sexual identity cracked me up, which might have been problematic if my manager (one veal pen over) had asked me what made me laugh. But thanks anyway; it was worth it.

Oh, and I think I may swipe a bunch of your userboxes... Septegram 16:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I just thought that I would contact you about your message on the wiccatalk page. I am currently without religion and I was wanting to know what the wiccan religion is all about, because what I know so far interest me. I would like it if you would contact my talk page if you are willing to introduce me into the religion.Solon Olrek 17:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't have a gmail account. Do you have a yahoo one?Solon Olrek 17:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, I will mail you ASAP.Solon Olrek 01:05, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sat/tan

Hi, I saw your plea for help on the Sat tan artcle. Are you still interested in getting it listed? As someone with an interest in the subject (not the religion) I'd be interested to have a go at getting it past the censors!

Do you still have a copy? --Mike 08:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Kuronue, I got a copy of the original:User:Haseler/Sandbox and I've virtually started again with: User:Haseler/Sat-Tan. From this quick edit I can see a few problems:

1. There are almost no reliable sources on the web
2. The article will not get in unless there is a clear statement of the origins of the Sat-Tan groups. There is nothing on the web
3. There is no reference in any of the domains .edu or .edu.uk (not very hopeful)
4. It would have to fit with all the other strands of satanism
5. I need to find an authorative source for the sanskrit sat & tan
6. I can virtually put everything that I can source into the opening paragraph!

E.g. I've been unable to find any authorative source (ie academic, major newspaper) which can put the beliefs of this group in any type of context.

Can you help? --Mike 10:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Modest Destiny

Hey there. I've just prodded A Modest Destiny as it doesn't seem to meet the web content notability guidelines. If you could take a look at it, that would be awesome. Thanks! --Brad Beattie (talk) 18:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! --Brad Beattie (talk) 22:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)