User talk:Kyaa the Catlord

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive1

Greetings!
My name is Ryan, and it's my pleasure to welcome you, Kyaa the Catlord, to Wikipedia! First of all, I'd like to thank you for joining the project, and contributing to articles and discussion. I hope you can continue to take part in Wikipedia, because we need more valuable editors like yourself.

If you are new and need some assistance, here are some great links to check out:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia are the primary goals and most important rules that we follow.
• These help pages are important if you'd like to learn more about specific processes.
• The tutorial is a hands-on approach to learning all about editing.
  • For a "crash course" in editing, head on over to Redwolf24's Bootcamp!
• Writing a great article is a noble accomplishment. An article you start might end up on the Main Page!
• The Manual of style is an in-depth group of pages that will teach you how to make articles look their very best.

I hope you enjoy editing here, and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, find out where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Before I go, here's one more tip. When you post on talk pages, be sure to sign your name and the date by typing four tildes: ~~~~. That automatically generates your username and the date. Again, welcome, and happy editing!  --Merovingian 10:27, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 barnstar 2 Barnstar 3 "flesh wound" 4 Reverting move closure 5 Re: Strawberry Panic! help 6 Edit warring

[edit] barnstar

		An Award
		I award this Barnstar to Kyaa the Catlord for the work on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy

_→AzaToth 19:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

		The Resilient Barnstar
		As an Englishman, I greatly admire unflappable grace under pressure. Your resilience while under attack from an iniquitous rat's nest of sockpuppeting trolls was truly inspiring. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Moreschi Request a recording? 22:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "flesh wound"

ha, i actually did lol after that one. :) --kizzle 20:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting move closure

Please do not attempt to revert an administrator's closure of a move proposal. This discussion was held during the normal time for move proposals and the outcome was no move. Húsönd 01:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

The discussion is no longer active. It has been active for a 5-day period, after which it can be closed at any time by an administrator. No consensus will ever be reached here. Húsönd 01:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

The result of the poll was no move, please do not persist with new polls, they're not going to change anything. And please observe WP:CIVIL. Thank you.--Húsönd 02:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean with reverting the first move? --Húsönd 02:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

The page was moved unilaterally previously, the original pages' history was lost, etc. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#CLAMP__.28history.7CWatchlist_this_WP:BLP_article.7Cunwatch.29_.5Bwatchlist.3F.5D} and the talk page for Clamp. Kyaa the Catlord 02:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

That's okay, I didn't think you were being too uncivil anyway, just wanted to make sure that tempers wouldn't flare. Unilateral moves are always troublesome. If this article was moved once before, the article should've been moved back and the user who attempted the first move be noticed that that was not an uncontroversial move and that his/her proposal would have to be taken to WP:RM. However, leaving the article in the new destination and making a proposal to move back somehow validates the current version and it'll be harder now for the article to be brought back if there's many users who would oppose that. Perhaps now it's time to continue the discussion about this (but not in a poll), and if some consensus is reached then attempt a new move proposal in a few months. I hope you got anything out of this. :-/ Regards, Húsönd 02:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Strawberry Panic! help

As you may know, the article is currently going through a peer review and once the PR is done, I'm going to nominate it for FA. Since you helped improve the article last summer, I was wondering if you'd like to help me bring it to FA.--十八 10:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring

Err...why are you edit-warring while lecturing other people about edit warring? If you want to insert an anti-science POV into the article, feel free, but don't lecture people while inserting that nonsense. Guettarda 04:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Guettarda, you are setting up very easy straw men arguing we are against the science. I suggest you stop with such fallacious arguments. Adding references to statements—common practice—isn't really a scientific debate. Attributing statements to sources rather than synthesized generalizations is not a scientific question, but rather a policy question. In all, I agree—stop edit warring. ~ UBeR 04:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)