Talk:List of Thank God You're Here episodes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] What is the general opinion on adding incomplete known future line ups?
I can understand why they would be removed for accuracy purposes, but for example, Ten make one the guests known via email on the Tuesday leading up to each episode and Shaun Micallef recently spoke on radio about the finale which he, Tony Martin and Julia Zemiro amongst others featured in.
- I think it's a good idea, as long as the information is (fairly) solid. I know Tony Martin and Ed Kavalee generally leak who is on the show on the Tuesday morning. So I can't see there being a problem in adding names BradK 07:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Anonymous here again, I got an entire copy of the Dave and Denise, With Shaun Micallef radio show from 20/10/2006 and can confirm the entire lineup now also contains Frank Woodley (Whom is either the first actor in the episode or will win the series) and Hamish Blake. The earlier details were from word-of-mouth, however this is completely accurate. If anyone wants for the sake of accuracy, I may be able to get the clip. Anonymous 08:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Nah I don't know guys..you can't really do that according to a wikipedia guideline. WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. For example, what if the show got unexpectedly axed (heaven forbid, i love the show)..and the info was there? ~ EmeZxX ` 07:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Against the idea. It's not some future balling outlook piece, so there seems little point in sticking up a cast list yet to broadcast for a show.RandomEcho 08:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Disagree. If the cast list is made known by guests stars before the show airs, or is published in a TV Guide (eg, The Age's Green Guide) in advance of the episode airing, then what's the harm in listing the guests of future episodes?? What makes this article the exception when so many other shows have spoilers posted for unaired episodes (look at Scrubs, for example), or worse still, have ambiguous, unclarified episode information that is gained from spoiler sites (ie, spoilerfix.com)?? --Ninevah 01:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Given that the show has already been filmed when this kind of information is realeased, it's perfectly accurate and it is known the event is 'almost certain to take place' (To quote WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball), meaning it doesn't actually break any of the rules for the aforementioned reasons. I find merit in posting this information given I find it generally impossible to find out before the show airs. Just more food for thought. Anonymous 15:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)