Talk:Logo (TV channel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class. |
It seems that the logo for, er, LOGO has changed again; looking at their website it doesn't seem to be the one shown here (or the one referenced in a recent BoingBoing article). What gives? Phil Bordelon 17:37, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC)
I'm also wondering why it's called LOGO? Is it just because it has an "L" and a "G" in it? -- Beland 01:21, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
It's called Logo because it's about identity.
Why is "First Comes Love" listed twice on this page - and a section called "Other programming new to U.S. audiences"?tdempsey 02:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Advertisement Tag
"How will they express their love for each other? Find out on First Comes Love.", "Only on LOGO!", etc. :: Supergolden 15:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- I've tried to clean it up; do we think the ad tag can be removed?Otto4711 10:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Logo or LOGO?
I'm just wondering which is the more official usage, capitalized or not? --Revolución (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- It seems to be Logo, rather than LOGO, according to their official site, most of the body text uses title case rather than all upper case. Aep 05:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reporting or Advertising
- I'm glad to see this entry but think that the descriptions of the shows on this network are in a style more appropriate for advertising the shows than for reporting on them. Interlingua 05:45, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please merge with...
Please merge this article with Logo (TV Channel). I created this page because I was not aware that this one was already here.
[edit] Programming lists
Are these at all helpful or useful? Every time I look at this page these lists strike me as being more and more of a waste of space. Otto4711 14:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Headers
At the bottom I think there are way too many headers with only the few sentences that can fill them. It seems more like an ad trying to sell the channel by pointing out interestinf features than a Wikipedia article. --OGoncho 08:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
