Talk:Lyocell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tencel was listed on VfD. After some research the generic name was found, and Tencel was redirected here. Here is the archived delete debate:
[edit] Tencel
- This one is also Wiktionary-bound. Denelson83 08:44, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - dicdef - Texture 14:16, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. As I said above, I think we should allow dicdefs to be speedy-deletion candidates. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 16:50, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)
- And this article is an example of why they shouldn't be. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 21:41, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - useful
- Delete - Quinwound 02:43, Mar 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, unless some information is added concerning the fabric's uses, properties, preperation, etc. Then it would be useful. The subject has potential, but this hasn't yet been exploited. Perhaps this should be made into a stub? Sietse 10:07, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Geesh. A few seconds Google work showed that this is a brand name for lyocell, which is a very important fabric and trivially an encyclopedic topic. I redirected Tencel to lyocell and wrote a small stub, that can obviously be dramatically expanded. I really wish people mindlessly writing "Delete!" on topics they nothing about, and moreover don't even attempt to find anything about would STOP IT. The time would be much better spent fixing articles. Oh, and keep by the way. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 15:25, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a fine example of people mistaking a stub for a dictionary definition, apparently through a failure to do even basic research. Jamesday 00:39, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Uhh...
I'm no expert at this, but shouldn't it be in English?
