Talk:Maritime history of Florida
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Maritime history of Florida has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. |
 |
A Wikipedian removed Maritime history of Florida from the good article list. There are suggestions below for improving areas to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, renominate the article as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Florida, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the State of Florida on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
 |
This article is a previous Unofficial Florida Article Improvement Drive. Click here to see how it improved! |
[edit] Date style
Anyone know whether there's a guideline for using the 1400s vs. the 15th century?
It would seem better to use the century links, unless we're referring to a specific year. --Tetraminoe 18:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article assessment
Very good article. A couple things may help it:
- Infobox-style lists. This is one of the only times I will ever advocate lists, and it could be used to provide a brief year/history rundown for each century.
- Inline references, but I know how much of a pain those are, so I understand why that alone would be a project.
Good job! —Rob (talk) 18:12, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Delisted GA
This article did not go through the current GA nomination process. Looking at the article as is, it fails on criteria 2b of the GA quality standards. Although references are provided, the citation of sources is essential for verifiability. Most Good Articles use inline citations. I would recommend that this be fixed, to reexamine the article against the GA quality standards, and to submit the article through the nomination process. --RelHistBuff 12:50, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
