User talk:Martha p
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Martha p, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Flex (talk|contribs) 19:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Citations
Hi! I saw the note you added to Rousas_John_Rushdoony and your note on my talk page. First, I'd advise you not to post material (even when you give a citation) that uses nearly identically wording but doesn't use quotation marks. That's a copyright violation. Second, please read the Wikipedia policy on neutrality. For instance, you may not make the Wikipedia claim objectively that RJR's book was an example of "extreme racism." Rather, you need to say "According to so-and-so, the book is an example of extreme racism," and then provide a footnote (which you did). Third, you may want to read WP:FN for the technical ins and outs of footnoting. One problem with the RJR article was that there was no existing references tag at the bottom (I added it). You also didn't have the fields filled out properly in the {{cite_news}} template and you had grammatical and spelling errors, but I fixed those problems, too. Hope that helps. Let me know if you have any more questions! --Flex (talk|contribs) 20:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Please see User_talk:Flex#Hi for an answer to your follow-up question. --Flex (talk|contribs) 20:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
BTW, I think the author of that article doesn't have enough context about presuppositionalism. RJR was drawing on the philosophy espoused by Cornelius Van Til (under whom Schaeffer also studied), whose ideas are most often applied as presuppositional apologetics. --Flex (talk|contribs) 20:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
