From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A switch from my previous Username of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard
McGrandWizard. 16:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reasons for unblocking
MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard . I am also wondering as to why my complaint [1] concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article [2] has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material. [3] McGrandWizard. 20:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) McGrandWizard. 20:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
why can't i make a request for unblocking? Why was this deleted? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMcGrandWizard.&diff=98300007&oldid=98000615
McGrandWizard. 11:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Piece of advice
- A piece of advice: Put your reason for the request in the unblock request. When an admionistrator sees the reason for unblock as being reason, he/she is less likely to deal with you. Eli Falk 13:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- see below was placed
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "See Below"
Decline reason: "Seriously, Mykungfu (talk • contribs), you have been permanently banned from editing Wikipedia. -- alphachimp 08:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "original unblock reason"
Decline reason: "Please follow the instructions for the template, Mykungfu, and then someone will address the matter. Thank you. -- ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Why do you keep referring me to Mykungfu? I have no association with that username. McGrandWizard. 20:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reasons for unblocking
MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard . I am also wondering as to why my complaint [4] concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article [5] has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material. McGrandWizard. 20:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. I am also wondering as to why my complaint concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material."
Decline reason: "I can see plenty of screams of "admin abuse" but little information that I can act on that would suggest an improper block. If you can provide diffs that are specific (rather than the very general ones you have so far given that also suggest a dutiful admin acting correctly, rather than someone on a mission) then I can review. But until then, your edits so far and your response don't give me anything to work with, so perhaps you might like to take this as the parting of the ways between you and Wikipedia. Either way, your choice. Thanks. ⇨REDVEЯS 21:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. I am also wondering as to why my complaint concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material. Also please take a look at my reasons for unblocking below."
Decline reason: "See response below. -- 〈REDVEЯS〉 19:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
[edit] Reasons for unblocking
- MrDarcy is the individual who has blocked me. I have switched the use of my sn from GrandWizard. Prior to my switch as can be noted on my my previous username MrDarcy had some kind of problem with me for an unknown reason. Please refer to the talk page here for further information. Thank you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GrandWizard .
- I am also wondering as to why my complaint [6] concerning links that are copyrighted material on the Alpha Phi Alpha article [7] has been removed by MrDarcy which is clear violation of Wiki policy concerning the linking of copywritten material.
Also please take a look at this "I'm looking at this an i'm confused. So a checkuser was brought by mrdarcy? why? he said if i needed any help to see him. [8] . this is really confusing. i said i didn't want any help [9] , so he accuses me of a violation? should i simply not use aol? that is the safest browser for me. my behavior follows a pattern? can you tell me what the pattern is? [10] because for the most part i do simple additions and did some research on a few things. Stacey Dash and Barry Bond's primarily, thanks. McGrandWizard. 00:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "see above. no justifiable basis for blocking me except for administrative abuse by MrDarcy."
Decline reason: "The sockpuppet evidence is very persuasive. You editing patterns are often unhelpful in the way you deal with other people. When asked for a reason to unblock you - something, anything - you respond with a repeat of your unjustified claims of unspecified abuse against a respected user. It hink we're done here, aren't we? -- 〈REDVEЯS〉 19:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.