Talk:Meaning (linguistics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Meaning (general) is a non-page. I have made it a redirect. Am removing the "merge" tag. Lucidish 23:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Ahhh great! These philosophy of language articles are basically ignored by the hordes. There's a lot of good content in here too, on a quick glance. Needs to be referenced, cleaned up and so on. I haven't looked too mcuh into the content of specific sections. But, from an overview, it seems that you are missing something on
the struggle between semantic atomisn, holism and so on. I can't decide if this should go in here or the other article. Probably here. The tranlsation/interpreation section of this one should probable be in the POL article. The logic is simplt that there is nothing on translation/interpreation there, yet is mentioned as one of the most importan aspect of POL. I think I'll move that over there and expand a bit. Don't worry, it wonìt blow up. We can alwways move more of the reference section out to the reference article (ahich I havenìt looked at yet.).--Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 13:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Sometimes it takes a fresh pair of eyes to catch this kind of thing, but now that I think of it, you're right. Lucidish { Ben S. Nelson } 15:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] overlap
hi. would please a linguist decide on whether my uneasy feeling about having semantics and meaning (linguistics) side by side is justified or not... Kku 14:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)