Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-11-02 Tajik and Pashtuns in Afghanistan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | ||||||||||||
|
Contents |
[edit] Mediation Case: 2006-11-02 Tajik and Pashtuns in Afghanistan
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Mediation Cabal: Coordination Desk.
[edit] Request Information
- Request made by: KP Botany 01:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- Afghanistan
- What's going on?
- Major edit wars, POV pushing, and personal attacks of each other and every one else who dares come near.
- What would you like to change about that?
- I'd like them to work together, as they actually have to the benefit of the article, and stop personally attacking each other, and for Tajik to stop personally attacking me as he sees me as a supporter of NisarKhan. Also, frankly, all of Tajik's bad behavior is being ignored, as are all of Nisar's efforts to debate, which is not helping the situation.
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- Yes, because if you include me in the loop, Tajik will automatically assume I'm a Pashtun pushing Nisar's POV, which is not quite the case, although the article and much of Wikipedia has a serious Persian-bias to all things Afghan. Contact me via e-mail, or not at all, just, please find someone who knows enough about Afghanistan that they can go there and mediate without pure Tajik-bias or pure Nisar-bias.
[edit] Mediator response
I will mediate. I have no bias. Geo. 01:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Closed per email conversation with KP. --Ideogram 09:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
[edit] Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.