Talk:MilkandCookies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
MilkandCookies (website) → MilkandCookies – The "(website)" part the the title of this page, MilkandCookies (website), is not necessary. Other websites listed on Wikipedia do not use "(website)" in there title. Eg: Fark, Boing Boing, Slashdot, Memepool, MetaFilter, Google, etc.
MilkandCookies is the Proper Name for the site.
I tried to rename it, but it does not work because the target, MilkandCookies, is already occupied by a redirect to MilkandCookies (website) with a page history, which requires an admin privileges.
Note: This was copied from the entry on the WP:RM page Jaxonbrooks 20:45, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support. This is a trivial change that follows existing Wikipedia standard naming conventions. Jaxonbrooks 21:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
[edit] This topic isn't worthy of staying?
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-02-06. The result of the discussion was keep. |
-
- It stayed. So I guess it is.
- Not necessarily. No mention of WP:WEB criteria in the deletion discussion. -- Barrylb 02:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- This site was covered more than once on TechTV when it used to be TechTV by Cat Schwartz. I also think you'd have trouble getting the site removed with such a high traffic rank, regardless of whether or not it satifies current WP:WEB --Crossmr 18:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- So why doesn't WP:WEB include traffic ranking as a criteria? -- Barrylb 12:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- WP:WEB is only a guideline, not a policy. The old WP:WEB used to include traffic ranking criteria from what I've read. Sites can still be quite notable without being published outside the internet. Milk and cookies is a highly linked site, with a high traffic rating, and has been covered on techTV. The site is back up today (it might have been just me, but I had trouble accessing it yesterday). [1] that is the coverage of milk and cookies. The current WP:WEB asks for multiple coverages, but when you couple that with the rest, no one is going to reach a concensus to remove the site. --Crossmr 14:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- So why doesn't WP:WEB include traffic ranking as a criteria? -- Barrylb 12:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- This site was covered more than once on TechTV when it used to be TechTV by Cat Schwartz. I also think you'd have trouble getting the site removed with such a high traffic rank, regardless of whether or not it satifies current WP:WEB --Crossmr 18:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. No mention of WP:WEB criteria in the deletion discussion. -- Barrylb 02:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- It stayed. So I guess it is.
