User talk:Nabarro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In regards to the Rumsfeld image, it looks awfully propogandist to me. Maybe not to others. Also, Wikipedia generally does not use collages for its images. We can ask the opinions of others, if you like. Did you make the image?
As for Briana Banks...I looked at your edit history to see if you had uploaded any other images, because I wanted to review them. During that pursuit, I came across an article that needed a copyedit, and so I copyedited it. Please don't take that as a personal attack.
Sincerely, Kingturtle 02:32, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image:050423-F-7203T-185.jpg
This image is listed at WP:IFD since it has been moved to Commons, Image:Dolly Parton in Nashville april 2005.jpg. Thuresson 04:32, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rumsfeld - B5 - Rumsfeld.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Rumsfeld - B5 - Rumsfeld.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 19:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
It's fine as a graphic piece, but fails to illustrate facts; and while it certainly portrays Donald Riumsfeld in a positive light, it definitely cannot be considered propaganda, as the image was created by you rather than the U.S. government. Your well-designed collage is in fact giving the false impression that it is a product of the U.S. government, which is quite unfortunate.--Pharos 06:39, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
