User talk:Narcissus14
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Why do some veteran Wikis throw around the pejorative "vandalism" whenever someone posts an edit they don't like? I'd expect them to be familiar with the Wikipedia definition of vandalism:
- "Vandalism is indisputable bad-faith addition, deletion, or change to content, made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia. The largest quantity of vandalism consists of replacement of prominent articles with obscenities, namecalling, or other wholly irrelevant content. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad faith edits that do not make their bad faith nature explicit and inarguable, are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia." see Wikipedia:Vandalism
[edit] WP:3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Aminz 11:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Gee, that's the same comment people made on your user page... Takes one to know one? But in truth I have no idea what you're talking about. I only reversed someone one time because he arbitrarily reversed my good edit. So what are you talking about?
