User talk:Necmate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Am I Japanese?

Contents 1 Re:Korea under Japanese rule 2 Comfort women 3 Winter Sonata 4 Joji Obara article

[edit] Re:Korea under Japanese rule

You need verifiable sources to add such information to the page worded in the format you typed. Also, there is already a section devoted to that part of history: Controversial statements regarding Japanese rule in Korea. If you feel there is something worth noting, please bring the issue up on the article's talk page. Avoid any non-neutral resources; I suggest reading these policies: WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:NOT before further edits are made. oncamera^(t) 14:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Thnak you. I wish to express my gratitude for your having given it according to the discussion. --Necmate 14:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok... I don't know why you want to discuss Korea with me, thus if you have any issues concerning Korean-related topics, use those article's talk pages to settle any content disputes or to discuss changes to those specific articles. That's the best way to avoid disputes on Wikipedia. Best regards, oncamera^(t) 14:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Japan and Korea's relations are very bad as know. Therefore, foreigner's mediator is important. I hope you mediate the controversy of Japan and Korea. --Necmate 13:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comfort women

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Comfort women. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Endroit 09:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Winter Sonata

Hey Necmate! I'd like to tell you that the method of validation that you advocate is WP:OR. It is simply unnecessary for us to list certain dramas that succeeded in Japan. To do so is original research because you shape your own thesis by using articles about how those individual dramas succeeded in Japan (not necessarily a reason why many dramas succeeded in Japan).

At the same time, I already gave a link to an article that stated that many S. Korean movie/drama productions are successful in Japan. Now, that is not original research & is good enough for the article to say "one of many successful dramas".

The reason why we want "one of many successful dramas" instead of "the successful drama" is that, as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia has to be generic b/c generic means NPOV & accurate. It's like true & false. Most statements that claim an absolute truth are false. Same here. It's simply un-encyclopedic to give Winter Sonata as the singlemost example of Korean dramas that succeeded in Japan. Why? Because readers think, "so what if a single drama was popular in Japan? That doesn't tell me anything." (Wikimachine 00:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC))

You can teach to me if there is a South Korea drama that succeeds really besides the winter sonata.

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:ShinjukuXYZ. Thank you. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 13:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Joji Obara article

See the talk page. Let's ask for a third opinion instead of constant reverting. Mackan 14:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Please take your discussion with Mackan off my talk page. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 14:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Samtheboy, you will be blocked from editing. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 14:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)