Talk:Personal Shorthand
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s importance scale. |
Amended so not so much of an advertisement - for example, challengeable claims of its superiority have been removed. Now just description of system, as per Gregg, Pitman etc. (Dawble 12:34, 28 February 2006 (UTC))
For a June 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Personal Shorthand
This article seems to me to be simply an advertisement. I believe it should be deleted, marked as a stub, merged with the main shorthand article, or made into part of a new article about proprietary shorthand systems. Or ?? Too Old 19:19, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
As a casual reader, I don't see anything wrong with the page as it is. Although a short bit of information like this could be included in another article, Personal Shorthand has enough significance to have its own page, and it's possible I'd be looking for just this information. Maybe that's what the contents of the page about discussing its deletion contains, since Personal Shorthand is still here. I came here looking for a bit more information though, and an example. 151.151.21.99 18:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
