User:Petros471/RfA reviews/CTSWyneken
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- CTSWyneken (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log)
- Edit count - Currently 4884, mostly article and article talk. Wikipedia:148, WP talk:50, usertalk 1111.
- Time around - First edit 20 June 2003
- Email enabled? - yes
- Controversial userpage? - only if people dislike public declaration of possible POV (not a problem for me as long as it doesn't enter articles)
- Any blocks? - no
- Stupid signature? - no
- Edit summaries - Mathbot "99% for major edits and 74% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 143 minor edits in the article namespace." Mostly used, bit low in places.
- Civil? No person attacks? - (check after full namespace review)
- Mistakes - (ditto)
- Any edit warring? - (ditto)
Main oppose reasons from last RFA:
- Low project space edits:
- Oppose by SlimVirgin, bias on Martin Luther, will need to take a look at this.
- Slight concern over low edit summary usage
- Narrow range of edits
- Not fully familiar with admin processes (e.g. blocking)
- "wolf in sheep's clothing" accusation/POV pushing
- General feeling of not being able to trust that admin tools won't be used to help in content disputes.
- Answers to questions - first couple are rather on the short side, not sure ignoring Doright on an RFA is best option- but not sure on this as I don't know the history of this editor.
