Talk:Pinocchio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
Tasks you can do:
|
|||
- "Unless an article is very short, it should start with a lead section comprising one or more introductory paragraphs. The lead should not be explicitly entitled == Introduction == or any equivalent header." Wikipedia:Guide to layout
See also Wikipedia:Lead section and Wikipedia:The perfect article. In each case the point is repeated: articles start with the summary — not with a picture, or a heading, or a quotation, but with a summary. This is important not merely for consistency (though that's important), but because the reading software used by blind and impaired users can hit problems when a page starts with anything else. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] plot
would be great if the actual content of Pinocchio could be added by someone who read it. Phelixxx 09:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- And better still to understand the psychological drive behind such a tale [1]. —Cesar Tort 22:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge Pinocchio (Shrek)
I'd prefer to keep this article about the novel and original character - there must be hundreds (thousands?) of derivative pinocchio's. -- Stbalbach 15:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's actually why I'd prefer to merge them. I'd rather have a footnote to the original article to acknowledge derivative characters than have a whole WP entry for every one of them. -- Tim Pierce 16:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Typically with classic novels that have many derivatives, there is a separate section or article listing the derivatives (*XYZ in popular culture.."), and each of those derivatives can also optionally have its own article. See Frankenstein or Dracula for example. This article is about the novel, not Shrek, so if Pinocchio (Shrek) should be merged, it should be merged to Shrek. However, there is also nothing wrong with separate articles for characters, so I suspect the Shrek people will also say its fine to keep it as a separate article. Long story short, Pinocchio (Shrek) is probably fine un-merged as it is, with a link to it from this articles "popular culture" section. -- Stbalbach 15:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- That is a very good point -- thanks for explaining it that way. I agree and will bring it up with the Shrek crowd, even though you're probably right that they will feel similarly. :-) Tim Pierce 21:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
-
