Talk:Pisces (astrology)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hmmm, it looks like a large section of the article was taken out. The comment was that it read like a horoscope, which, while true, contains information about Pisces, that someone might be looking for. I would think that it would be better to add such information into the other articles, rather than removing it from this. Any thoughts? -Todd 06:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- If it's that table you're talking about, I think it should be removed - or fixed so it doesn't break the page. The same problem seems to be on a few other astrology pages, if not all of them. Sosei 18:33, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
In case you're wondering what's happened to the Notable persons section, it has been deleted in favor of the page Category:Subjects of the Sign of Pisces. If you want to add a notable person go there. --Carmelita 21:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Beginning Date?
I always knew the beginning date to be February 19th, not 20th...was there a change?--Tainted Drifter 10:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Pisces has always started on February 19th and still does. However, people often add an extra day because they're not exactly certain. Most official sources generally use the earlier dates (eg. Sept. 23rd-October 22nd) as opposed to the later dates (eg. Sept. 24th- Oct. 23rd). 81.98.160.254 12:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I organized the article into different sections
--Alpha774 04:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notable persons?
(I'm gonna cross-post this): there is absolutely no need to have a "notable persons" section. What about cuspers (people born between two signs), what would they be? If they went under both that'd take up more space. You can't list EVERY single person ever born under one sign. If you want to know what a famous person's zodiac sign or birthday is, just look up their separate article on Wikipedia. If they are famous, they should be on Wikipedia. So yeah, I'm taking out the notable persons section and I'm warning people not to readd it.
Also, I don't think it should say "this sign is compatible with ____, ____, and ___" because that's like bending NPOV. 75.27.185.204 03:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sign of the fish in Christianity
This article claims that early Christians used a Pisces symbol to identify themselves to each other, but this is not accurate. The symbol was indeed that of a fish, but it was the ichthys, which is discussed in this Wiki article in detail: [[1]]. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 164.156.231.55 (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC).
ok
