User talk:Pmaccabe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you have something to say to me, say it here. Phil 05:02, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Style remarks
Thank you for creating the article cp index and related. Note that I moved it to this name from Cp Index, as on Wikipedia the style calls for capitals to be used sparingly, only at the beginning of sentence and in proper names. I also did some minor formatting on that and cpk index and Process capability. Looking at what I did (by checking the history of those articles) may give you a few more hints about style. :) Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Confirmation Hearings
Thank you for keeping a play by play. I couldn't do so. John wesley 00:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SCOTUS law clerks
Very ambitious... I'm looking forward to seeing it completed. Be mindful of the need to disambiguate, btw; I noticed a link to "John Adams." Postdlf 22:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, a very interesting article. I'm more into the statistical type of article, but am looking forward to more articles of all types in this area. NoSeptember 21:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Adding an element in a table to the TOC
Hi, I'm responding to your question at the Wikipedia:New contributors' help page.
Yes it is possible to add a table element to the TOC. Basically you just start the heading on a new line in the table (not after the usual "|"). I have set up some examples in my sandpit, feel free to play about there.
What I am confused about is using {{SCOTUS clerk}} in the list rather than just putting in the data normally. Perhaps there is a reason I'm not aware of?--Commander Keane 08:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- If you are comfortable with the template stick with it.--Commander Keane 12:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mike Lee
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mike Lee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Regards, Ben Aveling 09:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
