User talk:ProudPomeranian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Hi!
If you are interested in Poland, we have a Polish noticeboard[1] --Molobo 01:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. It's useful. ProudPomeranian 06:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Grass's nationality
- I generally agree that nationality and/or ethnicity sometimes is too narrowly defined, as in either-this-or-that. I've expressed that thought in the Copernicus discussion and elsewhere.
- In the case of Günter Grass, however, I'm not aware that he ever spoke Kashubian or made any particular claims himself about being Kashubian – although some Kashube characters appear in the Danzig Trilogy. In the over-all context of world literature, Grass is a German writer and is everywhere identified as such.
- I freely admit I don't know much about the Kashubians, other than having read that they are a west-Slav group distinct from the Poles proper, perhaps somewhat like the Sorbs of Saxony. I gather their expressions of nationality in the past have been somewhat flexible, depending on poltical winds, like the Upper Silesians. Certainly the area known to the Germans as West Prussia was a fascinating and probably volatile mixture of ethnicities.
Sca 16:09, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Well in his new novel, Beim Häuten der Zwiebel, Günter Grass openly admits that the family of Oskar Matzerath from The tin drum is actually his own family. That means his own uncle Franz was shot in 1939 for taking part in the defence of the Polish Post Office building in Danzig. The widow was resettled back to her native Kashubian hamlet (Rębiechowo) which is now the airport of Gdańsk. The runway actually runs over the former field of the aunt of Grass. The family still lives near by, according to the book. He visited them on his first post-war trip to Poland in 1958. I strongly encourage you to read the novel. ProudPomeranian 16:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- My understanding was that Beim Häuten der Zwiebel was his autobiography, not a novel.
- Of course I want to read it, but I haven't decided whether to buy the original or wait for the English translation. I do find some of Grass's complex German heavy-going, particularly when he gets into idiom and dialect. (Some English speakers would say he's heavy-going even in English!)
- I still believe Grass is appropriately described as 'a German writer.' As far as I have seen, he wrote all his books in German. Sca 20:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Right. It is an autobiography but written in a very novel-like style. Grass style if you see what I mean.
- The original of any book is better if you are able to read it with ease.
- Of course Grass is a German writer. He writes in German. But saying he's German and Kashubian does not substract anything from his Germaness. Rather it makes it richer and more interesting. Actually, this was my original point. I should have stated that being a hyphenated writer does not make you a partial German minus but a German plus. Of course it is true for any nationality. ProudPomeranian 21:03, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] your purposeful derailment of talk:Erika Steinbach
I would like it if you would not accuse me of sockpuppetry with no evidence. Your purpose was obviously to defame my character in the talk page and throw more confusion into the talk on the page. please, you have made a mockery of yourself and the Erika Steinbach talk. Your only evidence for me being a sockpuppeteer is that the other user is in the same timezone as me, by your reasoning, you should warn every user from EST zone that they are probably my sockpuppet. I have rarely, if ever, edited articles on Prussian borders, I edit articles on twentieth century German borders. and BTW, do you really think I would be so daft if I was his sockpuppeteer to include such obvious similarities? and night time is not the only reason people aren't active, some of us have jobs.
--Jadger 04:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I did not accuse you. I simply do not have enough evidence for this at this time. I just listed some coincidences which bothered me (like that all the defenders of the Prussian tradition have similar hours of operations, and it's not the timezone of Germany). I assume good faith but try to be wary at the same time. Please take note that I was careful not to throw any accusations. I will take your word and let go this controversy, at least until something new happens. However, you did not state in a direct fashion that you are not a socket puppeteer. Are you ready to do so? If so, I'm satisfied. Have a good day. ProudPomeranian 07:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you for your Poland-related contributions
|
[edit] Writing about Toruń-Bydgoszcz relations – quite a risky subject
If you are from Pomerania, perhaps even from Toruń, than you surely know how controversial and disputable are relations between Toruń and Bydgoszcz. Writing anything on this subject, as it's been recently done in an English article about Toruń, is like walking on a mine field – at least if what we say is meant to be objective. Taking this into consideration I really don't think that the following passage in the History section can be considered as objective: The city increase could be even bigger if the seat of the local voivodship administration unit hasn't been moved to Bydgoszcz in 1945.
Well, maybe it could have been, maybe it have not – but who really knows? The fact is that you expressed an opinion which is quite common in Toruń, but it's ex definitione subjective and emotional in many cases. So it is not a matter of facts – it is a matter of personal views. If we express such a point of view knowing about its being disputable, maybe we should mention about this? Shouldn't it also be noted in some way whose exactly opinion it is? Thus, I think that the passage once proposed by myself was much nearer to meet standards of objectivity:
There is a quite common opinion among the locals, though, that Toruń's postwar development could have been even more robust if the seat of regional administration hadn't been moved to Bydgoszcz in 1945. While such views are often somewhat emotional due to complicated relations between these two cities, there is indeed a number of facts which can be put forward as a proof that Toruń was actually pushed away from the main stream of centraly or regionaly managed investment of the time.
Possibly should the last sentence be expanded to give some examples corroborating that Toruń indeed was in some way “harmed” after the World War II?
I was a little afraid to expand the History section with passages devoted to the postwar era, because I've been aware of impossibility to write about this period without mentioning about Toruń-Bydgoszcz relations. Unfortunatelly, most locals, both in Toruń and Bydgoszcz, seem to exhibit a sort of inherent inability to discuss this subject on an objective base. It is also my problem, which I'm trying hard to fight back, because I've spent whole my life in Toruń, being born here. The problem is that, as far as I know, Wikipedia is meant to be objective. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.8.196.153 (talk • contribs).
- I believe your version was much further from objectivity than mine. However, I do agree that also my version is unnecessary. I would suggest removing the "feeling" fragment completely. Feel free to remove it, if you want. Just do not restore your version - it is not encyclopedic. Not at all.
- I'm neither from Toruń nor Bydgoszcz as none of these cities belong to Pomerania ;-) I was born in the land called here in the English Wikipedia Pomerelia and in modern Poland (but still in English) Eastern Pomerania.
- Please add your comments at the bottom of the Talk pages. By the way, why din't you respond on Talk:Toruń where I asked you for the reasons for reverting me? Obviously, I have it on my Watch list. ProudPomeranian 17:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
