User talk:Qwertysoup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Hangman game 23 2 Soccer boxes 3 Hangman Game 23 4 Celtic Userbox 5 1529? 6 Admin 7 Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test 8 Your score 9 Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test 10 A Western Sahara-related vote 11 Stress 12 Confused 13 Invitation

[edit] Hangman game 23

You can do game 23 if you like, but please read this first. There have been a few minor changes to how the game is updated, but it should be easy to figure out. If you have any questions just leave a note on my talk page. CanadaGirl 06:31, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Soccer boxes

I think List of soccer userboxes is more appropriate in Wikipedia:List of soccer userboxes. -- RHaworth 12:26, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hangman Game 23

Qwertysoup, it is advisable not to post the origins of your image in the history. Please note the edit summaries of both CanadaGirl and WB on the image page. Thanks Fetofs 13:12, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Celtic Userbox

Any chance of a Celtic FC userbox mate? Escobar600ie 12:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 1529?

Um... I'm not meaning to be rude or anything, but you've made 64 edits, been here one month, and yet you get 1529 on the Wikiholic test? This may be because someone edited one of the questions to carry a score of 1002 ([1] [2]). I reverted this change so that the question is still worth 20 points. If this is the reason your score is so high, please correct this, otherwise that's completely fine! Thanks, →FireFox 16:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Err ok that's fine then. I was just wondering if there was a simple explanation for you having a higher score than the most dedicated Wikipedians who have been here for years. Thanks anyway, →FireFox 16:24, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Admin

First, Welcome. I saw that you had started to self-nominate yourself for adminship, and then (thankfully) reverted yourself. Before you change your mind and go through with the nomination, I need to tell you right now that you do not stand a chance of becomming an administrator here any time soon. You are far to new under your current account, with far too few edits, and most of them appear to be Sandbox and Hangman entries. Most users' general qualifications for adminship when voting are at least 3 months active participation, 1500-2000+ edits (you have 75), a wide range of contributions and community involvement with a good track record of user interaction, and actual participation editing because we are an encyclopedia first and foremost above everything else (you have edited on just two entries). That you claim to be an admin on five forums is utterly irrelevant - this is not just some random forum, this is an encyclopedia, and one of the single largest and most visited sites on the internet, and we expect people who wish to become admins to have a very firm grasp of policy and procedures and to be dedicated and productive. Edit the encyclopedia more, broaden your range of contributions, and familiarize yourself with our standards, and in a few months time and after a couple thousand edits, you can become an administrator. Good luck, and once again, welcome. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 15:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test

Wikipedia is a comunity that thrives on honesty, you will not impress anyone with a fabricated Wikipediholic Test result which mesures dedication. With 79 edits you cannot possibly score that high as several questions talk about if you have done 100 edits etc.

I hence invite you to honesty. --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 21:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your score

I think that this discussion has become a bit out of hand. I don't think you meant to upset anyone, and I'm going to assume good faith in thinking that this was a mistake or a joke. I don't think the right idea is for people to get upset, but if you'd go ahead and retake the test, or at least discuss it, I think it would allow people ample opportunity to calm down and understand. Happy editing, Mysekurity 22:29, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Rack up some edits!

[edit] Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test

On this test, I saw that you had scored 1,595.37 points, which has sparked off some controversy. Is your score so high because you had edited as an unregistered user or under another username before? Or is it because you edited the test? Some of the users are suggesting that your entry is fake because:

1. you have very few edits
2. you noted on the Wikipediholic clinic that "I am the Champion". This made some users think that your entry on the top scores list was plain advertising

Please respond to these comments on the talk page. Thanks.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 15:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A Western Sahara-related vote

===>Here Make your voice heard. Vote or die. And all that. -Justin (koavf), talk 20:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

! Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — FireFox • T • 19:03, 26 February 2006

[edit] Stress

Esperanza hopes your stress blows by quickly :) Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 06:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Confused

You like conlangs but not EO?Cameron Nedland 19:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation

I would like to invite you to an interesting (and crazy) project of mine: reforming a dead Brazilian native language that ceased to be spoken in the early XIX century. I want to devise a writing system (it didn't have one), a more regularised Grammar and neologisms. So far I have produced a small handbook and 250-word dictionary, in English. If you are not sure if you would like to participate, read the article about the language in question and you'll instantly understand why I am so interested on this specific language. O, yes, conlang is fun! jggouvea 02:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)