Talk:Rhode Island Route 121
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of the Rhode Island Routes WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to highways in Rhode Island. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Split proposal
Support as nominator. Creating an article such as this one implies that the two roads share more than just a common route number. This does not appear to be the case. A case where an article like this one would be acceptable is in the case of Massachusetts/Rhode Island Route 114A, which straddles the border between the two states. Route 121, however, does not straddle the MA/RI border, nor does the road change designations as frequently as Route 114A does (in fact, Route 121 only changes designations once - at the state line.
The above text is a direct copy-and-paste of the discussion of MA/NH Route 286 with the appropriate changes. I feel that the two articles have the same issue. If there is a feeling of plagiarism in the first paragraph, I apologize for that now. I'm just bringing out the issue. Ed 16:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Erasmussen
- Oppose per Rhode Island Route 78. V60 干什么？ · VDemolitions · VRoads (路) 17:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Why is the article at "Rhode Island Route 121" and not at a more "neutral" name? --NE2 17:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The route and route numbers on both sides of the state line have a common origin and history. The roads were always numbered since routes were numbered in New England and had the same number in both states throughout its history even after a few number changes. We can move it to a more "neutral" name as NE2 suggested but I think merging is appropriate in this particular case. --Polaron | Talk 01:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
