Talk:Richard Krege
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
meaning his findinga were found incorrect by other historians. One heck of a statement - do historians always treat evidence this way. Some historians must feel obligated to follow up on this, don't they. How much would it cost to have Nitzor, ADL, JDL, etc one or all to rent a GPR and go check it out. Invite the deniers so you could rub the evidence in their ffaces, bring the news media along. No, why not?
Circling through the web it appears that Krege et al did their study a year after the Gora et al study was done. Did Kola and Gora have a rebuttal? Link? This has been almost 10 years for Gora etal to redo, etc their work.
-
- Who wrote this drivel??? Darkmind1970 16:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- User:159.105.80.219 has been wandering about on various talk pages writing this kind of drivel for a few days. He hasn't been editing article pages, only talk pages. Ignore him and he'll go away. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 16:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Is it worth pointing out on the main page that Krege is an electrical engineer who has never published his findings and whose so-called evidence is nebulous at best and actually disproves his own claims at worst? Darkmind1970 16:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- If you can find reliable sources for those statements, yes. No-one seems to have commented on him or his work, and it hasn't been published in any scholarly journal as far as I have been able to find out, nor has anyone but denier websites made anything of it. This makes it hard to make a sourced contribution to the article. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 17:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
-
