Talk:Scriptio continua
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the Project’s importance scale. |
Okaysolipogramisdefinedinalipogrambutthisisridiculous! -PierreAbbat
Ancient Greek was also written boustrophedon, too, wasn't it? Want to try that on the Article page? :-) -- Zoe
- Don't tempt me. (I have a half-shelf of books in Greek, and I could probably fake the coding.)
On a more serious note: does Thai have separate upper and lower case scripts? Vicki Rosenzweig
[edit] English sample
It makes no sense to give an English sample of scriptio continua. Scriptio continua only worked because the ancient Roman and Greek spellings were most predominantly phonemic, but modern English spelling is definitly not. -- j. 'mach' wust | ✑ 07:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- I partially agree. I see no point to such a long English sample. The English sample should be just a few words long (like the Chinese example), to give a feel of what it would be like if we used it in English. --61.68.108.167 07:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
It is illustrative and helpful for the reader to understand. -- Stbalbach 15:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
