User:Shazbot85

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

When it absolutely, positively has to be deleted overnight Del Ex

Shazbot's User Boxes

RFMD

This user is a Calvinist

DEL

This user is a deletionist

UofM

This user is a University of Memphis student.

ARP

This user is a member of the ARPC

ZzZz

This user is an insomniac.

en	This user is a native speaker of English.

es-1

Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.

DP	This user drinks nothing but Dr Pepper.

This user lives in Tennessee.

This user is interested in law.

CSL

This user enjoys the works of C.S. Lewis.

This user enjoys the works of
J. R. R. Tolkien.

This user contributes using Mozilla Firefox.

ubx-1

This user is a userbox novice.

User: Shazbot85 is a student at the University of Memphis. Shazbot85 looks forward to his graduation in the spring of 2007, and his entrance into law school in the fall of 2007.

1 Welcome
2 My Current Exploits
3 Victory!
4 Successful AfD's
5 Defeated AfD's
- 5.1 Countries visited

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to my userpage. It is becomming more and more attractive, at least to me, although probably not as well organized as most.

You compose it, I dispose it. Civil destruction of non-notable articles is my niche.

[edit] My Current Exploits

Sifting through anything relating to Reformed theology, Presbyterianism, and/or Calvinism.

Im also currently fooling around with creating user boxes. I created the Calvinist userbox at the top of my userboxes. If anyone is into advanced userboxery or is interested in fooling around with them as well, see user talk page.

[edit] Victory!

The Shadowclan Wikipedia page has been retained. I'm perusing other AfD's and throwing my two cents in on the subjects.

Shortlived! It appears a new user stumbled upon the Shadowclan page and put it up for yet another AfD. However, there is no argument for deletion presented so it should be a pretty cut and dry case. Stay away from notable matierial fellow deletionists!

Achieved again! the weak arguement against the page was defeated. It looks to have been raised by supporters of the Bloodclan Wikipedia page, which is a copycat clan of no notability. I'm now awaiting the descision on the AfD of the Bloodclan article and hope it turns out correctly, unmuddled by the mudslinging and falsities purported.