From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dec88/dec88af7492a2c2beb04aeed1a05de75af5f8e2b" alt="" |
This article is part of WikiProject Fire Service, which collaborates on fire service-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
??? |
This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale. |
Suggested article edit guidelines:
- To help us prioritise our workload, and in readiness for Wikipedia:1.0, we need to assess our articles for Quality. If this article is Unassessed, please assess it. See the Article Classification for instructions. If you disagree with a rating, you can change it or discuss it at Article Classification.
- After assessing this article's quality, please make sure it to add it to the Lists at Article Classification, following the grading scheme detailed there.
|
Please rate this article and leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
|
I recommend that this page be deleted. There is no such thing as a "Structural fire", only a Structure fire. I have copied the text from this entry over to the entry for "Structure fire". The words "Structrual Fire" imply that a fire is a part of the structure of something. I think it is pretty clear that fire, in and of itself, doesn't have any redeeming qualities in adding to the structure of anything; fire doesn't have the capacity to support a structure.
Things that are structural are structural beams, structural joists, etc.
If I had known how to use Wikipedia better, I would've requested to move Structural fire to Structure fire, but I didn't.
Please delete this entry. --CeruleanShine 04:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
Moved to structure fire, the previous talk relates to structural fire. - Bobet 14:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)