User talk:Theusualsuspect
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
You might also want to check out the Australian wikipedians' notice board. Cheers, Slac speak up! 22:00, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
You might also not insert SL propaganda into articles (Branch stacking). Adam 10:01, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] NOLS etc
You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rose_and_the_Jacksonettes given your reversions on NOLS. Fifelfoo 11:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not impressed
Please don't blanket revert a libellous (and in any event outdated) article in Andrew Landeryou. I have substantially revised it and believe it is brought up to date and not the defamation it was. Please discuss changes with me and we'll work out something. DarrenRay 14:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Your attempt to start a revert war over Landeryou's article is explained by the comment above on 24 July. Please leave your bias out of Wikipedia articles. DarrenRay 07:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Can you please restore the TotallyDisputed indicator on the Barendse article? DarrenRay 08:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] UMSU
Please do not indescriminately revert my edits just because they follow on from Darren Ray's. Xtra 23:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Please do not indiscriminately revert my edits just because they are Darren Ray's. DarrenRay 01:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Darren Ray
Is it really necessary to revert or remove every word Darren Ray writes? Your editing is encroaching on harassment, which, I might add, is also a violation of Wiki etiquette. I understand that he can be biased, but surely at least some of his edits can be built on and incorporated. And at least he has the guts to stand up and admit his bias. Whereas I have no idea where your coming from and why you appear so obsessed with removing everything he writes. This revert war is really silly and needs to stop. Please try to incorporate both sides into articles instead of indiscriminately blanket reverting.
Also, when you nominate something for speedy delete, you just place the tag on the page. You don't add it to the AfD page. It then shows up on speedy deletion list and an admin will come and check if it meets the requirements for speedy deletion. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 12:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. People should be judged on the merit of their edits, not on whether they contribute under their real name or not. That is what concerns me. I just keep seeing you reverting nearly everything Darren contributes and a lot of the time I don't think it is necessary. I do agree that he has an obvious bias, but then we're all biased. It's just a matter of whether or not we admit it. With regard to the statement that Carlo Carli is friends with de Pieri, I think it's a pretty petty and trivial thing to revert war over, specially as it's referenced in several different articles.
- No problems re the deletion nom. I just thought I'd mention it to you for next time you want to nominate something. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 18:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
I refer you to Kim Carr Talk page and welcome your response. DarrenRay 08:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
