Talk:Tony Capizzi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group. | ||
 |
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
|
Two anon ip addresses have modified this page claiming it is "inaccurate and misleading information." I've reverted, as they gave no information to determine what information was disputed, or how to verify it, and the original author seems to be a contributor in good standing. But I added the disputed tag; feel free to remove in a few weeks if no more information is forthcomming. JesseW 03:52, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I don't understand what the dispute is over inaccurate and misleading information. And so far as I can tell, my original article included only facts, no laudatory or critical commentary, so whether one is for or against Capizzi, I don't know what the objections were. I'm restoring the article with updated information on the 2004 election. Also, I'll include the link to Capizzi's campaign Web site, because I see no harm in it, although it will now be out of date. Acsenray 15:09, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Aha! I did find one inacurray. I had written that Capizzi lost the 2004 race when he had actually won, apparently. Well, that was a simple mistake that I've corrected. What else is inaccurate and misleading? Acsenray 15:17, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Actually, that link leads to some more biographical information provided by the Capizzi campaign itself. It can be a good source to fill out our article a bit more. I'll get around to it eventually, unless someone else (like the anonymous editors who objected to the original article) want to do it themselves. Acsenray 15:25, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Is there any reason to keep the dispute notice now? Acsenray 18:01, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Categories: Politics and government work group articles | Stub-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Unknown-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Stub-Class biography articles | Automatically assessed biography articles | Automatically assessed biography (politics and government) articles
