Talk:Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Echo Chamber
Echo chamber links here. Why? 195.7.54.2 16:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
I would guess it is referring to Miss Clinton's cranial cavity.Di4gram 04:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Conservative Media
What/who is this term referring to? Its used a couple times in the article as a nebulous entity. Is there a better way to say this? If not, it seems to not be needed. 172.131.58.54 08:39, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Referring to us, baby. Better watch your back; our Right-Wing Ninjas will come for you. :p Rogue 9 07:06, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Dittos. There doesn't seem to be any reference to the secret decoder wheels. I got one. Did you? ;-) Jlambert 02:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- "Conservative Media" refers to media that is conservative...don't see how it could be any more clear. --Tim4christ17 21:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- So...just Fox?
-
-
-
-
[edit] Current Usage
This section is not NPOV, it only shows one side of the issue. The Ken Starr investigation did not discredit the notion of a "conspiracy" as there were many prior attempts to smear the Clintons that turned out to be baseless. There are commentators on the Left who have stated that, for all intents and purposes, her statement was correct. --George100 01:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Very true, I cleaned it up some. C56C 21:51, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Yes, there are numerous commentators on the Left who have supported Hillary Clinton's claim. Of course, that doesn't make her claim any more accurate. One could just as readily point out the numerous commentators on the Right who think she was just pounding the pavement for sympathy points. Corrected for MASSIVE errors --- the preceding version couldn't possibly have been written by anyone who'd done research beyond surfing a few blogs. SOURCE material, people...go to the SOURCE, not to the OPINIONS. Calbeck 16 March 2007
[edit] Validity? Please!
How does Richard Mellon Scaife financing conservative groups and causes validate the "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy"? I mean, by that logic, there most definately is a "Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy". I mean, George Soros makes Scaife look like an amateur when it comes to throwing scads of money at political groups. Soros dedictated himself to ousting a sitting president, for pete's sake. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.50.151.8 (talk) 09:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC).
The difference in this case is that Soros used his money to fund legitimate political groups during an election while Scaife bankrolled various investigations to dig up unrelated sleaze right from the start of Clinton's presidency.
