Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Idu(yidu,Midu,Kera-ah)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Idu(yidu,Midu,Kera-ah) was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE
A very strange page. I was very close to calling it patent nonsense, and proposing it for a speedy delete. But perhaps there is something in it. In any case it would need a lot of rewriting. For now I propose to delete this. Sander123 13:04, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I retract me delete after the rewrite. Sander123 20:44, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- hear hear. delete Sexual maniac 13:06, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Nonsense.jni 13:55, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)- Delete: It's some kind of religious or ethnic thingie, I think. Nonsense, but not speedy. Geogre 14:18, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Do not delete - crappy article, but I've heard of these guys, and it's more or less correct. - Mustafaa 16:13, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I'm not going to strike out my "delete" vote because the unsearchable redirect term will need to be deleted at the end of the VfD period, but excellent work on the rewrite. It's now a solid and informative article that can grow. Geogre 18:04, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Looking good now, keep. Inky 20:54, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, good save. —siroχo 22:50, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)
- This REALLY Needs a different name. RickK 00:37, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
- As Geogre says, keep new article, but consider this a redirect for deletion. -R. fiend 05:02, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep new article, but list old name on RfD. — Gwalla | Talk 02:40, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
