Talk:X.509
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Cited Reference wasn't a Reference
The only cited reference doesn't actually seem to have been a source for the article, as it is actually about a compromise of the mechanism, and, although it may cover some of the facts in passing, it certainly doesn't cover most of them.
I've moved it to external links.
It was:
Arjen Lenstra, Xiaoyun Wang and Benne de Weger, Colliding X.509 Certificates, 1 March 2005, ePrint archive, [1].
--David Woolley 11:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- I've added a line about the X.509 certificate collision, and so moved the citation back to the "References" section. — Matt <small>Crypto</small> 12:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- There is still a problem that all but one paragraph lacks sources. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a template for this article's references are largely incomplete. --David Woolley 12:47, 15 November 2005 (UTC).
[edit] Sometimes I forget Wikipedia isn't necessarily for the "common man"
This article was linked from another article (the latter in "common-man's" English).
But after two quick glances my eyes just glazed over.
There's got to be a better way....
--angrykeyboarder (a/k/a:Scott) 14:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
