User talk:137.44.1.200/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Contents |
April 2004
Please do not create articles that are personal attacks on university officials. It would be useful to have an article describing the issues you oppose but they must be created from a neutral perspective or they will be deleted. - Tεxτurε 15:13, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
February 2006
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia! Your test worked, and thank you for reverting or removing it yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. Makemi 17:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
March 2006
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Brad Pitt. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Krich (talk) 15:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 15:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to University of Wales, Swansea. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thryduulf 15:24, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
April 2006
Thank you for experimenting with the page The chicken or the egg on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Luckyherb 11:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any malicious edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tom Cruise, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Jpkoester1 11:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
May 2006
This is your only warning. Your recent vandalism to Leroy Lita has shown you to be intent on doing harm to Wikipedia. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Robwingfield (talk) 00:23, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Emilie phelps was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 09:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the University of A Coruña article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing!--Kungfu Adam (talk) 03:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
June 2006
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Susannah and Trinny, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. David.Mestel 14:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
July 2006
August 2006
Thank you for experimenting with the page Cat food on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. David Mestel(Talk) 11:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cat food. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mike Christie 11:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
October 2006
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Progressive rock. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --17:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
November 2006
Your recent edit to Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
